Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genetic divergence in residual feed intake affects growth, feed efficiency, carcass and meat quality characteristics of Angus steers in a large commercial feedlot

R. M. Herd A B I , P. F. Arthur A C , C. D. K. Bottema A D , A. R. Egarr A D , G. H. Geesink A E , D. S. Lines A D G , S. Piper A E H , J. P. Siddell A F , J. M. Thompson A E and W. S. Pitchford A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies.

B NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia.

D School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.

E Division of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

F NSW Department of Primary Industries, Agricultural Research Station, Glen Innes, NSW 2370, Australia.

G Present address: Australian Pork Farms Group, Wasleys, SA 5400, Australia.

H Present address: The Angus Society of Australia, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

I Corresponding author. Email: robert.herd@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Animal Production Science 58(1) 164-174 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13065
Submitted: 19 February 2013  Accepted: 29 July 2013   Published: 25 February 2014

Abstract

Growth, feed intake, feed efficiency, and carcass and meat quality characteristics of 136 Angus steers differing in genetic merit for post-weaning residual feed intake (RFIp) were measured over 251 days in a large commercial feedlot. The steers were evaluated in two groups, low (Low-RFI) and high (High-RFI) genetic RFIp, measured by estimated breeding values for RFIp (RFIp-EBV). The difference in RFIp-EBV between the Low- and High-RFI groups was 1.05 kg/day (–0.44 vs 0.61 kg/day; P < 0.05). The Low- and High-RFI steers were similar (P > 0.05) in age (445 vs 444 days) and weight (435 vs 429 kg) at induction, and at the end of the feeding period (705 vs 691 kg). Average daily gain (ADG) over 251 days had a small negative association with variation in RFIp-EBV (P < 0.05), reflecting a 3.6% greater ADG accompanying a difference of 1 kg/day in RFIp-EBV. Pen feed intake and feed conversion by the Low-RFI group were 10.4 kg/day and 9.3 kg/kg, and for the High-RFI group were 11.1 kg/day and 10.4 kg/kg, but without availability of individual animal feed-intake data it was not possible to test for significant differences. Carcass weight and dressing-percentage was similar for the Low- and High-RFI steers. High-RFI steers had a significantly (P < 0.05) greater depth of subcutaneous rib fat at induction and finished with 5 mm more (P < 0.05) fat at the 10/11th ribs on the carcass than the Low-RFI steers. Cross-sectional area of the eye-muscle and three measures of intramuscular or marbling fat did not differ (P > 0.05) between the Low- and High-RFI steers. Shear force was higher (P < 0.05) in meat samples aged for 1 day from the Low-RFI steers, but there was no difference (P > 0.05) from the High-RFI steers after 7 days of ageing. Compression values for meat samples aged for 1 day did not differ between the RFI groups but were higher in meat samples aged for 7 days from the Low-RFI steers. For these Angus steers, genetic superiority in RFI was associated phenotypically with superior weight gain, decreased rib fat depth, slightly less tender meat, and no compromise in marbling fat or other carcass and meat quality traits.

Additional keywords: beef cattle, calpastatin, fat, marbling, NFI, RFI, tenderness.


References

Angus Society of Australia (2002) ‘Trial BREEDPLAN EBVs for net feed intake (NFI).’ (The Angus Society of Australia: Armidale, NSW)

Archer JA, Arthur PF, Herd RM, Parnell PF, Pitchford WS (1997) Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2024–2032.

Archer JA, Richardson EC, Herd RM, Arthur PF (1999) Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 147–161.
Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arthur PF, Herd RM (2006) Selection for growth and feed efficiency—The Australian experience. Journal of Integrated Field Science 3, 59–66.

Arthur P, Herd R (2007) Progeny testing of elite sires for profitability traits: Breeding, backgrounding and heifer evaluation. Final Report of Project PSHIP.095B, June 2007. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney, NSW.

Arthur PF, Herd RM (2008) Residual feed intake in beef cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 269–279.
Residual feed intake in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Brazilian Journal of Animal Science].

Arthur PF, Herd RM (2012) Genetic improvement of feed efficiency. In ‘Feed efficiency in the beef industry’. (Ed. R Hill) pp. 93–103. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Cambridge, MA)

Arthur PF, Archer JA, Johnston DJ, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Parnell PF (2001) Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2805–2811.

AUS-MEAT (2005) ‘Handbook of Australian meat.’ 7th edn. (AUS-MEAT Ltd: Tingalpa, Qld)

Barwick SA, Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Sullivan MT (2009) Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes, and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures. Animal Production Science 49, 351–366.
Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes, and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXotFOgtrc%3D&md5=b21d67fe1670bbecd003185426478634CAS |

Bouton PE, Ford AL, Harris PV, Ratcliff D (1975) Objective-subjective assessment of meat tenderness. Journal of Texture Studies 6, 315–328.
Objective-subjective assessment of meat tenderness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

BREEDPLAN (2010) BREEDPLAN EBVs – ‘The traits explained’. (ABRI, University of New England: Armidale, NSW)

Dunne PG, Monahan FJ, O’Mara FP, Moloney AP (2009) Colour of bovine subcutaneous adipose tissue: A review of contributory factors, associations with carcass and meat quality and its potential utility in authentication of dietary history. Meat Science 81, 28–45.
Colour of bovine subcutaneous adipose tissue: A review of contributory factors, associations with carcass and meat quality and its potential utility in authentication of dietary history.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1eisrjL&md5=a5dbb9207538947ba34c22046e12678aCAS | 22063959PubMed |

Harper GS (1999) Trends in skeletal muscle biology and the understanding of toughness in beef. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1105–1129.
Trends in skeletal muscle biology and the understanding of toughness in beef.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnsVGqu7o%3D&md5=00065077ddf823ba8809f1c9d1a3ca8dCAS |

Herd RM, Arthur PF (2009) Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 87, E64–E71.
Physiological basis for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3mtVWksA%3D%3D&md5=d6c00014ca611dad7617e26c1736d6a0CAS | 19028857PubMed |

Herd RM, Arthur PF (2012) Lessons from the Australian experience. In ‘Feed efficiency in the beef industry’. (Ed. R Hill) pp. 93–103. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Cambridge, MA)

Herd RM, Pitchford WS (2011) Residual feed intake selection makes cattle leaner and more efficient. In ‘Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – Australia, Vol. 18’. (Ed. P. Cronje) pp. 45–58. (University of New England: Armidale, NSW)

Herd RM, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2003a) Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: Opportunity and challenges to application. Journal of Animal Science 81, E9–E17.

Herd RM, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2003b) Selection for low postweaning residual feed intake improves feed efficiency of steers in the feedlot. In ‘Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Vol. 15’. (Ed. L Hygate) pp. 310–313. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics: Melbourne)

Jeyaruban MG, Johnston DJ, Graser HU (2009) Genetic association of net feed intake measured at two stages with insulin-like growth factor-I, growth and ultrasound scanned traits in Angus cattle. In ‘Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Vol. 18’. (Ed. A Safari) pp. 584–587. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics: Adelaide)

Johnston D (2007) NFI & IGF-I. AGBU Technical Update No. 14, March 2007. AGBU, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

Knight TW, Death AF, Lambert MG, McDougall DB (2001) The rate of reduction in carotenoid concentration in fat of steers fed a low carotenoid ration, and the role of increasing carcass fatness. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 1023–1032.
The rate of reduction in carotenoid concentration in fat of steers fed a low carotenoid ration, and the role of increasing carcass fatness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXotFyisrg%3D&md5=c4a775c882a4daa8844e87280a489086CAS |

Lines DS, Pitchford WS, Bottema CDK, Herd RM, Oddy VH (2014) Selection for residual feed intake affects appetite and body composition rather than energetic efficiency. Animal Production Science 54,
Selection for residual feed intake affects appetite and body composition rather than energetic efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | in press.

McDonagh MD, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Oddy VH, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2001) Meat quality and the calpain system of feedlot steers following a single generation of divergent selection for residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 1013–1021.
Meat quality and the calpain system of feedlot steers following a single generation of divergent selection for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXotlGhur4%3D&md5=3a6b95502a761dd308f502b8aa7712e0CAS |

Perry D, Shorthose WR, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM (2001) Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 953–957.
Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pitchford WS, Deland MPB, Siebert BD, Malau-Aduli AEO, Bottema CDK (2002) Genetic improvement in fatness and fatty acid composition of crossbred cattle. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2825–2832.

Pitchford WS, Accioly JM, Banks RG, Barnes AL, Barwick SA, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Donoghue KA, Edwards N, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Jones FM, Lawrence M, Lee SJ, McKiernan WA, Parnell PF, Speijers J, Tudor GD, Graham JF (2014) Genesis, design and methods of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project. Animal Production Science 54,
Genesis, design and methods of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | in press.

Richardson EC, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Thompson JM, Archer JA, Arthur PF (2001) Body composition and implications for heat production of Angus steer progeny of parents selected for and against residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 1065–1072.
Body composition and implications for heat production of Angus steer progeny of parents selected for and against residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robinson DL, Oddy VH (2004) Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 90, 255–270.
Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SAS (1989) ‘SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 6.’ 4th edn. (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)

Schenkel FS, Miller SP, Wilton JW (2004) Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth and body composition traits of young beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 177–185.
Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth and body composition traits of young beef bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schutt KM, Burrow HM, Thompson JM, Bindon BM (2009) Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle grown on pasture and in feedlots in subtropical and temperate Australia. 2. Meat quality and palatability. Animal Production Science 49, 439–451.
Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle grown on pasture and in feedlots in subtropical and temperate Australia. 2. Meat quality and palatability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Rohrer GA, Savell JW (1994) Heritabilities and phenotypic and genetic correlations for bovine postrigor calpastatin activity, intramuscular fat content, Warner-Bratzler shear force, retail product yield, and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 72, 857–863.

Shorthose WR, Harris PV, Hopkins AF, Kingston OL (1988) Relationships between some objective properties of beef and consumer perceptions of meat quality. In ‘Proceedings of the 34th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Vol. 1’. (Eds CS Chandler, RF Thornton) pp. 667–669. (AMLRDC/PRC: Brisbane)

Siebert B, Kruk Z, Davis J, Pitchford W, Harper G, Bottema C (2006) Effect of low vitamin A status on fat deposition and fatty acid desaturation in beef cattle. Lipids 41, 365–370.
Effect of low vitamin A status on fat deposition and fatty acid desaturation in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmtV2isbs%3D&md5=cb4b34f9af4b002b45a8656ec6af9612CAS | 16808150PubMed |

Smith SB, Go W, Johnson BJ, Chung KY, Choi SH, Sawyer JE, Silvey DT, Gilmore LA, Ghahramany G, Kim KH (2012) Adipogenic gene expression and fatty acid composition in subcutaneous adipose tissue depots of Angus steers between 9 and 16 months of age. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2505–2514.
Adipogenic gene expression and fatty acid composition in subcutaneous adipose tissue depots of Angus steers between 9 and 16 months of age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtlSgs7%2FK&md5=cee29fc8c72ef133f5f3b04646ae4d4dCAS | 22307484PubMed |

Watson R, Polkinghorne R, Thompson JM (2008) Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1368–1379.
Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Iker CL, Thompson JM, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 383–398.
Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |