Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Artificial reefs act as cleaning stations in temperate waters

Kurt N. Krispyn A , James H. Florisson B and James R. Tweedley https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-1060 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Environmental and Conservation Sciences and Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

B Recfishwest, 3/45 Northside Drive, Hillarys, WA 6025, Australia.

* Correspondence to: j.tweedley@murdoch.edu.au

Handling Editor: Karissa Lear

Pacific Conservation Biology 31, PC25049 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC25049
Submitted: 2 July 2025  Accepted: 27 August 2025  Published: 23 September 2025

© 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Keywords: behaviour, cleaning symbiosis, client, ectoparasites, enhancement, facultative cleaner, fish, habitat, Labridae, mutualism, posing, symbiosis.

Artificial reefs (ARs) are structures installed in aquatic habitats that serve as a substrate and/or shelter for organisms and are often used to restore or enhance fish populations. While a great deal of the research on ARs has focused on the abundance of fish species associated with these habitats, comparatively little is known about the behaviour of these fish. Cleaning symbiosis, where, following communication, a cleaner removes and consumes ectoparasites, mucus, dead tissue or unwanted particles that negatively impact a client, has been recorded in over 200 fish species from 36 families, four of which are species of Coris (Vaughan et al. 2017). Most cleaners occur in tropical marine waters, but there are examples from temperate areas, including five fish (Tilodon sexfasciatus, Siphonognathus beddomei, Cochleoceps bicolor, Austrolabrus maculatus and Enoplosus armatus) and one crustacean (Periclimenes aesopius) species on inshore rocky reefs in South Australia (Shepherd et al. 2005). Cleaning events are often associated with cleaning stations that typically develop at sites with vertical relief where fish aggregate.

ARs, each comprising 30 ‘Fish Box’ modules (3 m3) constructed from steel-reinforced concrete, were deployed in coastal waters off Bunbury, Dunsborough and Mandurah in south-western Australia to increase the abundance of recreationally-important fish species (Florisson et al. 2018). Fish assemblages were monitored using remote underwater video (Hero 2018, GoPro Inc.) at the three ARs and one natural site comprising sand with rocky outcrops 2 km from the Mandurah AR. This study was conducted in accordance with Murdoch University Animal Ethics Permit O3085/18. Female Coris auricularis (Western King Wrasse (Labridae)) were observed cleaning a range of clients, including teleosts such as the pelagic carangids Pseudocaranx georgianus and Seriola hippos and, less frequently, the epibenthic Aracana aurita, Neatypus obliquus, Acanthaluteres vittiger, Chelmonops curiosus, Upeneichthys lineatus and benthic elasmobranch Myliobatis tenuicaudatus (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Extract from an underwater video showing a female Western King Wrasse (Coris auricularis) cleaning a Silver Trevally (Pseudocaranx georgianus) and another Silver Trevally adopting a head-up display to request an approach from a nearby cleaner.


PC25049_F1.gif

Both the client and cleaner initiated cleaning interactions. Clients would swim around or through the modules slowly before entering a head-up or head-down approach, with erect fins and flared gills, or, in the case of M. tenuicaudatus, with their pectoral fins pointed to the surface (Supplementary material). Cleaners also adopted a head-up position individually or in groups. As gut content studies demonstrate that C. auricularis is an opportunistic zoobenthivore (Lek et al. 2011), it is most likely a facultative rather than obligate cleaner, similar to other cleaners in temperate waters (Shepherd et al. 2005). The presence of facultative cleaners provides additional benefits to resident and transitory fish, and may be an underreported benefit of ARs. These findings are important as ARs are increasingly being used to restore/enhance the abundance and diversity of aquatic fauna and as ecological offsets.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.

Data availability

The data that support this study will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of funding

This project was supported by Recfishwest and the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development through funding from the Recreational Fishing Initiatives Fund and Murdoch University.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Lachie Ramm and the recreational fishers who participated in the Reef Vision program. We thank Tackle World Miami and Whiteys Tackle and Camping for supplying bait and providing logistical support.

References

Florisson JH, Tweedley JR, Walker THE, Chaplin JA (2018) Reef vision: A citizen science program for monitoring the fish faunas of artificial reefs. Fisheries Research 206, 296-308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lek E, Fairclough DV, Platell ME, Clarke KR, Tweedley JR, Potter IC (2011) To what extent are the dietary compositions of three abundant, co-occurring labrid species different and related to latitude, habitat, body size and season? Journal of Fish Biology 78(7), 1913-1943.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Shepherd S, Teale J, Muirhead D (2005) Cleaning symbiosis among inshore fishes at Althorpe Island, South Australia and elsewhere. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 129, 193-201.
| Google Scholar |

Vaughan DB, Grutter AS, Costello MJ, Hutson KS (2017) Cleaner fishes and shrimp diversity and a re-evaluation of cleaning symbioses. Fish and Fisheries 18(4), 698-716.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |