Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Mapping the impact of subsoil constraints on soil available water capacity and potential crop yield

Mikaela J. Tilse https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-6078 A * , Thomas F. A. Bishop A , John Triantafilis B and Patrick Filippi A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Precision Agriculture Laboratory, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

B Manaaki Whenau – Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: mikaela.tilse@sydney.edu.au

Handling Editor: Andrew Fletcher

Crop & Pasture Science 73(6) 636-651 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP21627
Submitted: 9 August 2021  Accepted: 25 January 2022   Published: 25 February 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context: The depth-to a constraint determines how much of the soil profile, and the water it contains, can be accessed by plant roots. Information describing the impacts of soil constraints on available water capacity (AWC) and yield is important for farm management, but is rarely considered in a spatial context.

Aims and methods: The depth-to three yield-limiting constraints (sodicity, salinity, and alkalinity) was mapped across ∼80 000 ha in northern New South Wales, Australia using machine learning and digital soil mapping techniques. Soil AWC was calculated using soil data and pedotransfer functions, and water use efficiency equations were used to determine potential yield loss due to the presence of soil constraints. From this, the most-limiting constraint to yield was mapped.

Key results: One or more constraints were found to be present across 54% of the study area in the upper 1.2 m of the soil profile, overall reducing the AWC by ∼50 mm and potential yield by an average of 1.1 t/ha for wheat and 0.8 bales/ha for cotton. Sodicity (Exchangeable Sodium Percentage > 15%) was identified as the most-limiting constraint to yield across the study area.

Implications: The simplification of multiple sources of information into a single decision-making tool could prove valuable to growers and farm managers in managing soil constraints and understanding important interactions with available water and yield.

Keywords: decision trees, digital soil mapping, pedotransfer function, precision agriculture, Random Forest, soil constraints, soil water, yield potential.


References

Arrouays D, Grundy MG, Hartemink AE, Hempel JW, Heuvelink GBM, Hong SY, Lagacherie P, Lelyk G, McBratney AB, McKenzie NJ, Mendonca-Santos MdL, Minasny B, Montanarella L, Odeh IOA, Sanchez PA, Thompson JA, Zhang G (2014) Chapter Three - GlobalSoilMap: toward a fine-resolution global grid of soil properties. In ‘Advances in agronomy’. (Ed. DL Sparks) pp. 94–134. (Elsevier)
| Crossref |

Austin JM, Stockmann U, Verburg K (2019) Using pedotransfer functions to improve the precision of spatially predicted available water capacity. In ‘23rd International congress on modelling and simulation’. The National Convention Centre, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 1–6 December 2019. pp. 372–378. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand: Canberra)
| Crossref |

Bennett JMcL, Cattle SR, Singh B (2015) The efficacy of lime, gypsum and their combination to ameliorate sodicity in irrigated cropping soils in the Lachlan Valley of New South Wales. Arid Land Research and Management 29, 17–40.
The efficacy of lime, gypsum and their combination to ameliorate sodicity in irrigated cropping soils in the Lachlan Valley of New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bishop TFA, McBratney AB, Laslett GM (1999) Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines. Geoderma 91, 27–45.
Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bishop TFA, Horta A, Karunaratne SB (2015) Validation of digital soil maps at different spatial supports. Geoderma 241–, –249.
Validation of digital soil maps at different spatial supports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bot A, Nachtergaele F, Young A (2000) ‘Land resource potential and constraints at regional and country levels’, (Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome)

Bramley RGV, Ouzman J (2019) Farmer attitudes to the use of sensors and automation in fertilizer decision-making: nitrogen fertilization in the Australian grains sector. Precision Agriculture 20, 157–175.
Farmer attitudes to the use of sensors and automation in fertilizer decision-making: nitrogen fertilization in the Australian grains sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32.
Random forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buchanan S, Triantafilis J, Odeh IOA, Subansinghe R (2012) Digital soil mapping of compositional particle-size fractions using proximal and remotely sensed ancillary data. Geophysics 77, WB201
Digital soil mapping of compositional particle-size fractions using proximal and remotely sensed ancillary data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) (2021) Summary statistics - Moree Aero. Climate statistics for Australian locations. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_053115.shtml. [Accessed 5 August 2021]

Cull PO, Hearn AB, Smith RCG (1981) Irrigation scheduling of cotton in a climate with uncertain rainfall. Irrigation Science 2, 127–140.
Irrigation scheduling of cotton in a climate with uncertain rainfall.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dalal RC, Blasi M, So HB (2002) DNR6 – High sodium levels in subsoil limits yields and water use in marginal cropping areas. Grains Research & Development Corporation Project No. DNR 6.

Dang YP, Routley RD, McDonald M, Dalal R, Alsemgeest V, Orange D (2004) Effects of chemical subsoil constraints on lower limit of plant available water for crops grown in southwest Queensland. In ‘New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress in conjunction with the 12th Australian Agronomy Conference and the 5th Asian Crop Science Conference’. 26 September–1 October 2004, Brisbane, Australia. (Ed. T Fischer) (Australian Society of Agronomy: Brisbane)

Dang YP, Dalal RC, Routley R, Schwenke GD, Daniells I (2006) Subsoil constraints to grain production in the cropping soils of the north-eastern region of Australia: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 19–35.
Subsoil constraints to grain production in the cropping soils of the north-eastern region of Australia: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dang YP, Dalal RC, Mayer DG, McDonald M, Routley R, Schwenke GD, Buck SR, Daniells IG, Singh DK, Manning W, Ferguson N (2008) High subsoil chloride concentrations reduce soil water extraction and crop yield on Vertosols in north-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 321–330.
High subsoil chloride concentrations reduce soil water extraction and crop yield on Vertosols in north-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dang YP, Dalal RC, Buck SR, et al. (2010) Diagnosis, extent, impacts, and management of subsoil constraints in the northern grains cropping region of Australia. Soil Research 48, 105–119.
Diagnosis, extent, impacts, and management of subsoil constraints in the northern grains cropping region of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dang YP, Pringle MJ, Schmidt M, Dalal RC, Apan A (2011) Identifying the spatial variability of soil constraints using multi-year remote sensing. Field Crops Research 123, 248–258.
Identifying the spatial variability of soil constraints using multi-year remote sensing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Department of Finance, Services and Innovation (2020) NSW Foundation Spatial Data Framework – elevation and depth – digital elevation model. (Department of Customer Service) Available at https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset/ee5e06a2-255b-48e4-9f55-ec3c0e7bcec8. [Accessed 8 August 2021]

Filippi P, Cattle SR, Bishop TFA, Odeh IOA, Pringle MJ (2018a) Digital soil monitoring of top- and sub-soil pH with bivariate linear mixed models. Geoderma 322, 149–162.
Digital soil monitoring of top- and sub-soil pH with bivariate linear mixed models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Filippi P, Cattle SR, Bishop TFA, Pringle MJ, Jones EJ (2018b) Monitoring changes in soil salinity and sodicity to depth, at a decadal scale, in a semiarid irrigated region of Australia. Soil Research 56, 696–711.
Monitoring changes in soil salinity and sodicity to depth, at a decadal scale, in a semiarid irrigated region of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Filippi P, Jones EJ, Ginns BJ, Whelan BM, Roth GW, Bishop TFA (2019a) Mapping the depth-to-soil pH constraint, and the relationship with cotton and grain yield at the within-field scale. Agronomy 9, 251
Mapping the depth-to-soil pH constraint, and the relationship with cotton and grain yield at the within-field scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Filippi P, Jones EJ, Wimalathunge NS, Somarathna PDSN, Pozza LE, Ugbaje SU, Jephcott TG, Paterson SE, Whelan BM, Bishop TFA (2019b) An approach to forecast grain crop yield using multi-layered, multi-farm data sets and machine learning. Precision Agriculture 20, 1015–1029.
An approach to forecast grain crop yield using multi-layered, multi-farm data sets and machine learning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Filippi P, Jones EJ, Bishop TFA (2020a) Catchment-scale 3D mapping of depth to soil sodicity constraints through combining public and on-farm soil databases – a potential tool for on-farm management. Geoderma 374, 114396
Catchment-scale 3D mapping of depth to soil sodicity constraints through combining public and on-farm soil databases – a potential tool for on-farm management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Filippi P, Whelan BM, Vervoort RW, Bishop TFA (2020b) Mid-season empirical cotton yield forecasts at fine resolutions using large yield mapping datasets and diverse spatial covariates. Agricultural Systems 184, 102894
Mid-season empirical cotton yield forecasts at fine resolutions using large yield mapping datasets and diverse spatial covariates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

French RJ, Schultz JE (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743–764.
Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R (2017) Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment 202, 18–27.
Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gray JM, Bishop TFA, Wilford JR (2016) Lithology and soil relationships for soil modelling and mapping. Catena 147, 429–440.
Lithology and soil relationships for soil modelling and mapping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grundy MJ, Viscarra Rossel RA, Searle RD, Wilson PL, Chen C, Gregory LJ (2015) Soil and landscape grid of Australia. Soil Research 53, 835–844.
Soil and landscape grid of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hazelton P, Murphy B (2016) ‘Interpreting soil test results: what do all the numbers mean?.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
| Crossref |

Hochman Z, Dalgliesh NP, Bell K (2001) Contributions of soil and crop factors to plant available soil water capacity of annual crops on Black and Grey Vertosols. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 955–961.
Contributions of soil and crop factors to plant available soil water capacity of annual crops on Black and Grey Vertosols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell R (2016) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
| Crossref |

Leenaars JGB, Claessens L, Heuvelink GBM, Hengl T, Ruiperez González M, van Bussel LGJ, Guilpart N, Yang H, Cassman KG (2018) Mapping rootable depth and root zone plant-available water holding capacity of the soil of sub-Saharan Africa. Geoderma 324, 18–36.
Mapping rootable depth and root zone plant-available water holding capacity of the soil of sub-Saharan Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30122789PubMed |

Lin LI-K (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255–268.
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Looney JW (1991) Land degradation in Australia: the search for a legal remedy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 46, 256–259.

Ma Y, Minasny B, McBratney A, Poggio L, Fajardo M (2021) Predicting soil properties in 3D: should depth be a covariate? Geoderma 383, 114794
Predicting soil properties in 3D: should depth be a covariate?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Malone BP, McBratney AB, Minasny B, Laslett GM (2009) Mapping continuous depth functions of soil carbon storage and available water capacity. Geoderma 154, 138–152.
Mapping continuous depth functions of soil carbon storage and available water capacity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Minty B, Franklin R, Milligan P, Richardson M, Wilford J (2009) The radiometric map of Australia. Exploration Geophysics 40, 325–333.
The radiometric map of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Naidu R, Rengasamy P, De Lacy NJ, Zarcinas BA (1995) Soil solution composition of some sodic soils. In ‘Australian sodic soils: distribution, properties and management’. (Eds R Naidu, M Sumner, P Rengasamy) pp. 155–161. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Northcote KH, Srene JKM (1972) ‘Australian soils with saline and sodic properties.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Office of Environment and Heritage - OEH (2017) ‘NSW landuse.’ pp. 2007 (NSW Government: Australia)

Padarian J, Minasny B, McBratney AB, Dalgliesh N (2014) Predicting and mapping the soil available water capacity of Australian wheatbelt. Geoderma Regional 2–3, 110–118.
Predicting and mapping the soil available water capacity of Australian wheatbelt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Padarian Campusano JS (2014) Provision of soil information for biophysical modelling. Masters Thesis, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/2123/12278

Page KL, Dalal RC, Wehr JB, Dang YP, Kopittke PM, Kirchhof G, Fujinuma R, Menzies NW (2018) Management of the major chemical soil constraints affecting yields in the grain growing region of Queensland and New South Wales, Australia – a review. Soil Research 56, 765–779.
Management of the major chemical soil constraints affecting yields in the grain growing region of Queensland and New South Wales, Australia – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rab MA, Fisher PD, Armstrong RD, Abuzar M, Robinson NJ, Chandra S (2009) Advances in precision agriculture in south-eastern Australia. IV. Spatial variability in plant-available water capacity of soil and its relationship with yield in site-specific management zones. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 885–900.
Advances in precision agriculture in south-eastern Australia. IV. Spatial variability in plant-available water capacity of soil and its relationship with yield in site-specific management zones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at https://www.r-project.

Roth G, Harris G, Gillies M, Montgomery J, Wigginton D (2013) Water-use efficiency and productivity trends in Australian irrigated cotton: a review. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 1033–1048.
Water-use efficiency and productivity trends in Australian irrigated cotton: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sadras V, Baldock J, Roget D, Rodriguez D (2003) Measuring and modelling yield and water budget components of wheat crops in coarse-textured soils with chemical constraints. Field Crops Research 84, 241–260.
Measuring and modelling yield and water budget components of wheat crops in coarse-textured soils with chemical constraints.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shatar TM, McBratney AB (2004) Boundary-line analysis of field-scale yield response to soil properties. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 553–560.
Boundary-line analysis of field-scale yield response to soil properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shaw RJ (1997) Salinity and sodicity. In ‘Sustainable crop production in the sub-tropics: an Australian perspective’. (Eds AL Clarke, PB Wylie) pp. 79–96. (Queensland Department of Primary Industries: Brisbane)

Singh B, Odeh IOA, McBratney AB (2003) Acid buffering capacity and potential acidification of cotton soils in northern New South Wales. Soil Research 41, 875–888.
Acid buffering capacity and potential acidification of cotton soils in northern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Strobl C, Boulesteix A-L, Kneib T, Augustin T, Zeileis A (2008) Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 307
Conditional variable importance for random forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18620558PubMed |

Triantafilis J, Huckel AI, Odeh IOA (2001) Comparison of statistical prediction methods for estimating field-scale clay content using different combinations of ancillary variables. Soil Science 166, 415–427.
Comparison of statistical prediction methods for estimating field-scale clay content using different combinations of ancillary variables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Gool D, Tille P, Moore G (2005) Land evaluation standards for land resource mapping: assessing land qualities and determining land capability in south-western Australia. Report 298. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth.

Veihmeyer FJ, Hendrickson AH (1949) Methods of measuring field capacity and permanent wilting percentage of soils. Soil Science 68, 75–94.
Methods of measuring field capacity and permanent wilting percentage of soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wimalathunge NS, Bishop TFA (2019) A space-time observation system for soil moisture in agricultural landscapes. Geoderma 344, 1–13.
A space-time observation system for soil moisture in agricultural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wright MN, Ziegler A (2017) ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. Journal of Statistical Software 77, 1–17.
ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wright MN, Ziegler A, König IR (2016) Do little interactions get lost in dark random forests? BMC Bioinformatics 17, 145
Do little interactions get lost in dark random forests?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27029549PubMed |

Zhao X, Wang J, Zhao D, Li N, Zare E, Triantafilis J (2019) Digital regolith mapping of clay across the Ashley irrigation area using electromagnetic induction data and inversion modelling. Geoderma 346, 18–29.
Digital regolith mapping of clay across the Ashley irrigation area using electromagnetic induction data and inversion modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |