Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differential responses of yield and shoot traits of five tropical grasses to nitrogen and distance to trees in silvopastoral systems

Laíse da Silveira Pontes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3906-3047 A * and Emilio A. Laca B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Rural Development Institute of Paraná – IAPAR-EMATER, Ponta Grossa, PR CEP 84001-970, Brazil.

B Department of Plants Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

* Correspondence to: laisepontes@idr.pr.gov.br

Handling Editor: Brendan Cullen

Crop & Pasture Science 75, CP23081 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP23081
Submitted: 22 March 2023  Accepted: 15 September 2023  Published: 13 October 2023

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Light intensity and nitrogen availability are important factors influencing the growth of C4 forage species. Trade-offs may occur in the adaptive responses of species to shading and nitrogen inputs, and functional shoot traits can help to explain the consequences of these responses for species performance.

Aims

Our objective was to gain understanding of the mechanisms involving shoot traits of grasses that determine above-ground dry matter yield (DMY) when resources, light and nitrogen all vary.

Methods

Five C4 perennial forage grasses were grown in six shading conditions (full sunlight vs five positions between Eucalyptus dunnii rows) with two nitrogen levels (0 vs 300 kg N ha−1 year−1) and clipped when the canopy reached 95% light interception. Path analysis was used to explore the relationship between DMY, shading levels, nitrogen nutrition index and shoot traits.

Key results

Yield increased between 126 and 569 g dry matter m−2 with nitrogen fertilisation. Plant nitrogen concentration was the most important predictor of DMY. Increased shading reduced DMY by 6.94–12.5 g dry matter m−2 for each 1% increase in shading. DMY was also modulated by shoot traits such as specific leaf area, sheath length and leaf area index (via leaf area and tiller density), but with different responses according to species.

Conclusions

The five species compared adopted different mechanisms involving shoot traits, revealing different strategies to cope with changes in light and nitrogen availability.

Implications

Agroforestry practitioners may want to choose forages that are more likely to maintain biomass yield as trees grow.

Keywords: agroforestry systems, Eucalyptus dunnii, forage species, functional leaf traits, light interception, nitrogen nutrition index, shade, species strategies.

References

Abraham EM, Kyriazopoulos AP, Parissi ZM, Kostopoulou P, Karatassiou M, Anjalanidou K, Katsouta C (2014) Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity, and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments. Agroforestry Systems 88, 287-299.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Aerts R, Chapin FS, III (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a reevaluation of process and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30, 1-67.
| Google Scholar |

Al Haj Khaled R, Duru M, Theau JP, Plantureux S, Cruz P (2005) Variation in leaf traits through seasons and N-availability levels and its consequences for ranking grassland species. Journal of Vegetation Science 16, 391-398.
| Google Scholar |

Baldissera TC, Pontes L da S, Giostri A, Barro RS, Lustosa SBC, Moraes A, Carvalho PC de F (2016) Sward structure and relationship between canopy height and light interception for tropical C4 grasses growing under trees. Crop & Pasture Science 67, 1199-1207.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Baodi D, Mengyu L, Hongbo S, Quanqi L, Lei S, Feng D, Zhengbin Z (2008) Investigation on the relationship between leaf water use efficiency and physio-biochemical traits of winter wheat under rained condition. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 62, 280-287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Barthram GT (1985) Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. In ‘The Hill Farming Research Organization. Biennial Report 1984/1985’. pp. 29–30. (The Hill Farming Research Organization: Penicuik, Scotland)

Bartón K (2022) MuMIn: multi-model inference. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Benjamin LR (2017) Growth analysis, crops. In ‘Encyclopedia of applied plant sciences, Vol. 3’. 2nd edn. (Eds B Thomas, BG Murray, DJ Murphy) pp. 23–28. (Academic Press: Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2011) Plant functional traits with particular reference to tropical deciduous forests: a review. Journal of Biosciences 36(5), 963-981.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cingolani AM, Posse G, Collantes MB (2005) Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 50-59.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Craine JM, Tilman D, Wedin D, Reich P, Tjoelker M, Knops J (2002) Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Functional Ecology 16, 563-574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Devkota NR, Kemp PD, Hodgson J, Valentine I, Jaya IKD (2009) Relationship between tree canopy height and the production of pasture species in a silvopastoral system based on alder trees. Agroforestry Systems 76, 363-374.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Farruggia A, Gastal F, Scholefield D (2004) Assessment of the nitrogen status of grassland. Grass and Forage Science 59, 113-120.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) ‘An R companion to applied regression.’ 3rd edn. (Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA)

Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, Laurent G (2001) A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Functional Ecology 15, 688-695.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas M-L, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint J-P (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85, 2630-2637.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gibon A, Balent G, Duru M, Gibon A, Magda D, Theau JP (1997) ‘Les prairies permanentes de milieu océanique et de montagne humide. Outils de diagnostic agro-ecologique et guide pour leur utilisation.’ (INRA Editions: Toulouse, France)

Gilbert P, Varadhan R (2019) numDeriv: accurate numerical derivatives. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/numDeriv/index.html

Gommers CMM, Visser EJW, Onge KRS, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2013) Shade tolerance: when growing tall is not an option. Trends in Plant Science 18(2), 65-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Greenwood DJ, Lemaire G, Gosse G, Cruz P, Draycott A, Neeteson JJ (1990) Decline in percentage N of C3 and C4 crops with increasing plant mass. Annals of Botany 66, 425-436.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gross N, Suding KN, Lavorel S (2007) Leaf dry matter content and lateral spread predict response to land use change for six subalpine grassland species. Journal of Vegetation Science 18, 289-300.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hirose T, Bazzaz FA (1998) Trade-off between light- and nitrogen-use efficiency in canopy photosynthesis. Annals of Botany 82, 195-202.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hodgson JG, Wilson PJ, Hunt R, Grime JP, Thompson K (1999) Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos 85(2), 282-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kazakou E, Garnier E, Navas M-L, Roumet C, Collin C, Laurent G (2007) Components of nutrient residence time and the leaf economics spectrum in species from Mediterranean old-fields differing in successional status. Functional Ecology 21, 235-245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kephart KD, Buxton DR (1993) Forage quality responses of C3 and C4 perennial grasses to shade. Crop Science 33, 831-837.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Knowles JE, Frederick C, Whitworth A (2020) merTools: tools for analyzing mixed effect regression models. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/merTools/index.html

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13), 1-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kyriazopoulos AP, Abraham EM, Parissi ZM, Koukoura Z, Nastis AS (2013) Forage production and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata and Trifolium subterraneum mixtures under different shading treatments. Grass and Forage Science 68, 72-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Köppen W, Geinger R (1928) ‘Klimate der erde.’ (Verlag justus perthes: Gotha (Wall-map))

Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace M-P, Garden D, Girel J, Pellet G, Douzet R (2011) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 99, 135-147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lemaire G, Gastal F (1997) N uptake and distribution in plant canopies. In ‘Diagnosis of the nitrogen status in the crops’. (Ed. G Lemaire) pp. 3–43. (Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany)

Liancourt P, Corcket E, Michalet R (2005) Stress tolerance abilities and competitive responses in a watering and fertilization field experiment. Journal of Vegetation Science 16, 713-722.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lin CH, McGraw RL, George MF, Garrett HE (1998) Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices. Agroforestry Systems 44, 109-119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Long JA (2019) interactions: comprehensive, user-friendly toolkit for probing interactions. Available at https://interactions.jacob-long.com/

Louault F, Pillar VD, Aufrère J, Garnier E, Soussana J-F (2005) Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science 16, 151-160.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lötscher M, Stroh K, Schnyder H (2003) Vertical leaf nitrogen distribution in relation to nitrogen status in grassland plants. Annals of Botany 92, 679-688.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Osone Y, Ishida A, Tateno M (2008) Correlation between relative growth rate and specific leaf area requires associations of specific leaf area with nitrogen absorption rate of roots. New Phytologist 179, 417-427.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Paciullo DSC, Fernandes PB, Gomide CAdM, Castro CRTd, Sobrinho FdS, Carvalho CABd (2011) The growth dynamics in Brachiaria species according to nitrogen dose and shade. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 270-276.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Paciullo DSC, Gomide CAM, Castro CRT, Maurício RM, Fernandes PB, Morenz MJF (2017) Morphogenesis, biomass and nutritive value of Panicum maximum under different shade levels and fertilizer nitrogen rates. Grass and Forage Science 72, 590-600.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pandey CB, Verma SK, Dagar JC, Srivastava RC (2011) Forage production and nitrogen nutrition in three grasses under coconut tree shades in the humid-tropics. Agroforestry Systems 83, 1-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pang K, Van Sambeek JW, Navarrete-Tindall NE, Lin C-H, Jose S, Garrett HE (2019) Responses of legumes and grasses to non-, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA. I. Forage yield and its species-level plasticity. Agroforestry Systems 93, 11-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Peri PL, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2007) Dry matter production, morphology and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata growing under different light regimes. Agroforestry Systems 70, 63-79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pezzopane JRM, Nicodemo MLF, Bosi C, Garcia AR, Lulu J (2019) Animal thermal comfort indexes in silvopastoral systems with different tree arrangements. Journal of Thermal Biology 79, 103-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pontes L da S, Soussana J-F, Louault F, Andueza D, Carrère P (2007) Leaf traits affect the above-ground productivity and quality of pasture grasses. Functional Ecology 21, 844-853.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pontes L da S, Louault F, Carrère P, Maire V, Andueza D, Soussana J-F (2010) The role of plant traits and their plasticity in the response of pasture grasses to nutrients and cutting frequency. Annals of Botany 105, 957-965.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pontes L da S, Maire V, Schellber J, Louault F (2015) Grass strategies and grassland community responses to environmental drivers: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35, 1297-1318.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pontes L da S, Giostri AF, Baldissera TC, Barro RS, Stafin G, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Moletta JL, César de Faccio Carvalho P (2016) Interactive effects of trees and nitrogen supply on the agronomic characteristics of warm-climate grasses. Agronomy Journal 108, 1531-1541.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytologist 182, 565-588.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Premazzi LM, Monteiro FA, Corrente JE (2003) Tillering of Tifton 85 bermudagrass in response to nitrogen rates and time of application after cutting. Scientia Agricola 60, 565-571.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Vendramini F, Cornelissen JHC, Gurvich DE, Cabido M (2003) Leaf traits and herbivore selection in the field and in cafeteria experiments. Austral Ecology 28, 642-650.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2021) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria). Available at https://www.R-project.org/

Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62, 365-392.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Reich PB, Buschena C, Tjoelker MG, Wrage K, Knops J, Tilman D, Machado JL (2003) Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. New Phytologist 157, 617-631.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Reynolds PE, Simpson JA, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2007) Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering 29(4), 362-371.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robinson D, Hayes A, Couch S (2023) broom: convert statistical objects into tidy tibbles. Available at https://broom.tidymodels.org/, https://github.com/tidymodels/broom

Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, Lipowsky A, Weigelt A, Buchmann N, Schmid B, Schulze E-D (2012) Using plant functional traits to explain diversity–productivity relationships. PLoS ONE 7, e36760.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA. Available at http://www.rstudio.com/

Ryser P, Lambers H (1995) Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast- and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant and Soil 170, 251-265.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sbrissia AF, Silva SCd (2008) Tiller size/density compensation in Marandu palisadegrass swards. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37(1), 35-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schellberg J, Pontes LdS (2012) Plant functional traits and nutrient gradients on grassland. Grass and Forage Science 67, 305-319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) ‘Biometry.’ (W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA)

Treydte AC, Heitkönig IMA, Prins HHT, Ludwig F (2007) Trees improve grass quality for herbivores in African savannas. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8, 197-205.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Triches GP, Moraes Ad, Porfírio-da-Silva V, Lang CR, Lustosa SBC, Bonatto RA (2020) Damage caused by cattle to Eucalyptus benthamii trees in pruned and unpruned silvopastoral systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 55, e01275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Trindade JKd, Silva SCd, Souza Júnior SJd, Giacomini AA, Zeferino CV, Guarda VDA, Carvalho PCdF (2007) Morphological composition of the herbage consumed by beef cattle during the grazing down process of marandu palisadegrass subjected to rotational strategies. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 42, 883-890.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Valladares F, Niinemets U (2008) Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39, 237-257.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) ‘Modern applied statistics with S.’ 4th edn. (Springer: New York, NY, USA)

Vieira Junior NA, Evers J, dos Santos Vianna M, Pedreira BCe, Pezzopane JRM, Marin FR (2022) Understanding the arrangement of Eucalyptus-Marandu palisade grass silvopastoral systems in Brazil. Agricultural Systems 196, 103316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Vitra A, Deléglise C, Meisser M, Risch AC, Signarbieux C, Lamacque L, Delzon S, Buttler A, Mariotte P (2019) Responses of plant leaf economic and hydraulic traits mediate the effects of early- and late-season drought on grassland productivity. AoB PLANTS 11(3), plz023.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wallau MO, Sollenberger LE, Quesenberry KH, Vendramini JMB, Mullenix MK (2014) Evaluation of limpograss (Hemarthria altissima) breeding lines under different grazing management systems. Tropical Grasslands – Forrajes Tropicales 2, 149-150.
| Google Scholar |

Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil 199, 213-227.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4(43), 1686.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wilson JR (1996) Shade-stimulated growth and nitrogen uptake by pasture grasses in a subtropical environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1075-1093.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wilson JR, Ludlow MM (1991) The environment and potential growth of herbage under plantations. In ‘Forage for plantation crops. Proceedings of a Workshop’, 27–29 June 1990, Sanur Beach, Bali, Indonesia. (Eds HM Shelton, WW Stür) pp. 10–24. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) Proceedings No. 32)

Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (1999) Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytologist 143, 155-162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wright IJ, Westoby M (2000) Cross-species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs leaf function in 28 Australian woody species. Functional Ecology 14, 97-107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology 15, 423-434.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821-827.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Garnier E, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Villar R, Warton DI, Westoby M (2005) Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytologist 166, 485-496.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Zheng S, Chi Y, Yang X, Li W, Lan Z, Bai Y (2022) Direct and indirect effects of nitrogen enrichment and grazing on grassland productivity through intraspecific trait variability. Journal of Applied Ecology 59, 598-610.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |