Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

The shoot and root growth of Brachypodium and its potential as a model for wheat and other cereal crops

Michelle Watt A C , Katharina Schneebeli A , Pan Dong A B and Iain W. Wilson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan 625014, China.

C Corresponding author. Email: michelle.watt@csiro.au

Functional Plant Biology 36(11) 960-969 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09214
Submitted: 11 August 2009  Accepted: 18 September 2009   Published: 5 November 2009

Abstract

The grass genetic model Brachypodium (Brachypodium distachyon (L.) Beauv., sequenced line Bd 21) was studied from germination to seed production to assess its potential as a phenotypic model for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and other cereal crops. Brachypodium and wheat shoot and root development and anatomy were highly similar. Main stem leaves and tillers (side shoots) emerged at the same time in both grasses in four temperature and light environments. Both developed primary and nodal axile roots at similar leaf stages with the same number and arrangement of vascular xylem tracheary elements (XTEs). Brachypodium, unlike wheat, had an elongated a mesocotyl above the seed and developed only one fine primary axile root from the base of the embryo, while wheat generally has three to five. Roots of both grasses could develop first, second and third order branches that emerged from phloem poles. Both developed up to two nodal axile roots from the coleoptile node at leaf 3, more than eight nodal axile roots from stem nodes after leaf 4, and most (97%) of the deepest roots at flowering were branches. In long days Brachypodium flowered 30 days after emergence, and root systems ceased descent 42 cm from the soil surface, such that mature roots can be studied readily in much smaller soil volumes than wheat. Brachypodium has the overwhelming advantage of a small size, fast life cycle and small genome, and is an excellent model to study cereal root system genetics and function, as well as genes for resource partitioning in whole plants.

Additional keywords: Arabidopsis, architecture, genome, monocotyledons, photoperiod, root anatomy, tillering.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Dave Garvin for supplying the Brachypodium distachyon line Bd 21 seed, Dr John Vogel for advice on growing conditions and Drs Frank Hochholdinger, Margaret McCully and Richard Richards for valuable suggestions to the manuscript. This study was funded in part by a CSIRO Julius Award to MW and KS, a CSIRO-Ching Scholarship to PD and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC).


References


Araki H, Iijima M (2001) Deep rooting in winter wheat: rooting nodes of deep roots in two cultivars with deep and shallow root systems. Plant Production Science 4, 215–219.
CAS | Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Bossolini E, Wicker T, Knobel PA, Keller B (2007) Comparison of orthologous loci from small grass genomes brachypodium and rice: implications for wheat genomics and grass genome annotation. The Plant Journal 49, 704–717.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Bramley H, Turner NC, Turner DW, Tyerman SD (2009) Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots. Plant Physiology 150, 348–364.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Derera NF, Marshall DR, Balaam NL (1969) Genetic variability in root development in relation to drought tolerance in spring wheats. Experimental Agriculture 5, 327–337.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Draper J, Mur LAJ, Jenkins G, Ghosh-Biswas GC, Bablak P, Hasterok R, Routledge APM (2001) Brachypodium distachyon. A new model system for functional genomics in grasses. Plant Physiology 127, 1539–1555.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Esau K (1977) ‘Anatomy of seed plants.’ 2nd edn. (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Gregory PJ, McGowan M, Biscoe PV, Hunter B (1978) Water relations of winter wheat. I. Growth of the root system. The Journal of Agricultural Science 91, 91–102.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hochholdinger F, Zimmermann R (2008) Conserved and diverse mechanisms in root development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11, 70–74.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Hochholdinger F, Park WJ, Sauer M, Woll K (2004) From weeds to crops: genetic analysis of root development in cereals. Trends in Plant Science 9, 42–48.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Hoppe D, McCully ME, Wenzel CL (1986) The nodal roots of Zea: their development in relations to structural features of the stem. Canadian Journal of Botany 64, 2524–2537. open url image1

Hoshikawa K (1969) Underground organs of the seedlings and the systematics of Gramineae. Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 130, 192–203.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kellogg EA (2001) Evolutionary history of the grasses. Plant Physiology 125, 1198–1205.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM (2007) Root penetration rate – a benchmark to identify soil and plant limitations to rooting depth in wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 590–602.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM, Howe GN, Graham JM (2007) Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 303–315.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Klepper B, Belford RK, Rickman RW (1984) Root and shoot development in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 76, 117–122. open url image1

Mac Key J (1978) Wheat domestication as a shoot : root interrelation process. In ‘Proceedings of 5th International Genetics Symposium, New Delhi. Vol 2’. (Ed. S Ramanujam) pp. 875–890.

Manschadi AM, Christopher J, deVoil P, Hammer GL (2006) The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Functional Plant Biology 33, 823–837.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

O’Toole JC, Bland WL (1987) Genotypic variation in crop plant root systems. Advances in Agronomy 41, 91–145.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Opanowicz M, Vain P, Draper J, Parker D, Doonan JH (2008) Brachypodium distachyon: making hay with wild grass. Trends in Plant Science 13, 172–177.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Osmont KS, Sibout R, Hardtke CS (2007) Hidden branches: developments in root system architecture. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58, 93–113.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Passioura JB (1983) Roots and drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management 7, 265–280.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Radford BJ, Key AJ (1993) Temperature affects germination, mesocotyl length and coleoptile length of oats genotypes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 677–688.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Raju MVS, Steeves TA (1998) Growth, anatomy and morphology of the mesocotyl and the growth of appendages of the wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seedling. Journal of Plant Research 111, 73–85.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ries RE, Hofmann L (1991) Research observations: standardized terminology for structures resulting in emergence and crown placement of 3 perennial grasses. Journal of Range Management 44, 404–407.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schiefelbein JW, Benfey PN (1991) The development of plant roots: new approaches to underground problems. The Plant Cell 3, 1147–1154.
CAS | Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Varney GT, Canny MJ, Wang XL, McCully ME (1991) The branch roots of Zea. I. First order branches, their number, sizes and division into classes. Annals of Botany 67, 357–364. open url image1

Vogel J , Bragg J (2009) Brachypodium distachyon, a new model for the Triticeae. In ‘Genetics and genomics of the Triticeae’. (Eds C Feuillet, G Muehlbauer), in press.

Vogel JP, Garvin DF, Leong OM, Hayden DM (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and inbred line development in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 84, 119–211.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vogel J, Tuna M, Budak H, Huo N, Gu T, Steinward M (2009) Development of SSR markers and analysis of diversity in Turkish populations of Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Plant Biology 9, 88.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Watt M, Rebetzke GJ, Kirkegaard JA (2005) A wheat genotype developed for rapid leaf growth copes well with the physical and biological constraints of unploughed soil. Functional Plant Biology 32, 695–706.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Watt M, Magee LJ, McCully ME (2008) Types, structure and potential for axial water flow in the deepest roots of field-grown cereals. New Phytologist 178, 135–146.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Weaver JE (1926) ‘Root development of field crops.’ (McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.: New York)

Wenzel CL, McCully ME, Canny MJ (1989) Development of water conducting capacity in the root systems of young plants of corn and some other C4 grasses. Plant Physiology 89, 1094–1101.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak FC (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1